Romantasy, fantasy and in between
I always liked fantasy, and specially sword and sorcery. I always read fantasy novels, watched fantasy films, and played and mainly was the game master for my RPG party. I designed my own system and players loved it. I enjoyed every step of worldbuilding: spells, monsters, making a map of the world, and so on.
I did my own system and world, because I never liked the ones in RPG books. Dungeon and Dragons was probably my favorite, but wizards were too weak. As a system, I loved Runequest, but I was not convinced about the playable races and the world that it described.
But I always found that both in books and games, there was an ingredient missing: romance.
How we define this story with fantasy and romance? We need to know how much romance it has, and the way it is depicted.
THE PROBLEM: HOW MUCH ROMANCE?
How much romance a story has maybe defines its genre in the minds of some people. I have seen that some make this distinction:
- A fantasy story with romance: if you remove the romance part, the story still is there. If you remove the fantasy elements, the story is absurd.
- A romance with fantasy: if you remove the romance, you break the story. If you remove the fantasy elements, the story is still there.
- If Conan doesn't go with women, he becomes a very boring character.
- Elric loved his true love and the fact of losing her defines all his story.
- Corum may throw the towel if it was not for Ralina.
- Aragorn may have little motivation to become king without Arwen.
- Ivanhoe without romance becomes worse story.
- And so on...
- If he's not a wizard, then what?
- If she's a normal woman, then what?
- What if they were two normal human people? The story may be completely different and impossible to be written as is.
HOW IS ROMANCE DESCRIBED IN THE STORY?
- You see two characters that say they love each other, they may kiss one or two times, and they usually stay 1 meter away from each other. Typical in traditional fantasy stories. Think Aragorn and Arwen.
- They engage in explicit physical mating activities, with full descriptions of each step. Typical in most romantic fantasy out there.
- Many people feel ashamed reading those things. It cheapens the story.
- We really don't need them. We can already know they do those things.
- I think I could actually write them tastefully and engaging. Probably I may get something really exciting and deep. Birth rate may increase. But it feels like it takes people out of focus of what is beyond that: love.
I don't want them, the nymphs, to be "fanservice", but a sign of love for nature, of protection. And by extension, make a story that pleases men and women, and that improves our world, not makes it worse.
THE THIRD WAY
- Describe their feelings, what they feel when they are together.
- Describe how their relationship works in small gestures, daily signs of care and love.
- Describe their couple games that are fun and suggestive, but without all the detail.
- Describe the intimate acts, if needed, with poetic, emotional language, and not explicit descriptions.
AND HOW DO WE CALL THIS?
How would you call it? Do you agree with what I said? Tell in comments! :)


Comments
Post a Comment